2022’de Lozan-İsviçre’de moderatör ve tartışmacısı olarak yaptığım sunumların kısa özetleri aşağıdadır.
Keywords: Integrative Psychotherapy, Subjectivity, Context, Two-person Therapies, Chaos Theory
Moderator’s Summary:
Burak Sensoz
pskburaksensoz@gmail.com, Institute of Psychotherapy, Turkey.
Subjective is the appraisal of a judgment based on the individual. Estimated valuation is varies from person and different for everyone. Psychotherapy is a formal interaction process between two parties. In psychotherapy, there is a relationship between client and psychotherapist within scope of the psychotherapist approaches. Most psychotherapists include themselves in the integrative approaches each year, many publications are produced explicitly aim at integrating different therapies. Nowadays, the current point is integration of psychotherapies that evolved from one-person therapies to two-person therapies, system therapies, and chaos theories, on the basis of subjectivity and contextualism. (Özakkaş, 2018) When psychotherapists receiving integrative psychotherapy education are analyzed, in terms of the methods and techniques used they are all different from each other. The reason for this difference, the psychotherapist’s relationship with the client during the session and there are possibilities that the therapists may have their own characteristics and past life. Three integrative psychotherapists treating the same client to apply different theories and paths is the subjectivity of psychotherapy as common factors of psychotherapies.
Advantages of this panel for attendees:
- Attendees can observe the formulation of different theories on clients.
- Attendees can observe the client observation of three integrative psychotherapists.
- Attendees can evaluate subjectivity in different contexts such as therapist, therapist-client, client, attendees.
Discussant’s Presenter:
Burak Sensoz
pskburaksensoz@gmail.com, Institute of Psychotherapy, Turkey.
When we read the summarize of the client from the perspective of the three integrative psychotherapists, there are similarities and differences in the perspective of the client. In this case, whose first session examined, the psychotherapists examined the formulation and treatment in their own subjectivity when we can see, we will find the opportunity to evaluate it on our own subjectivity from the perspective of an outside debater and spectator. We will combine all of them together at spot in our subjectivity for differantiate or compare, a discussant presentation will take place for find commonalities in the theories and techniques used by psychotherapists. While three psychotherapists can not be found in the common spot, while evaluating the client from the perspective whatever theory and techniques used of integrative psychotherapy, the healing effect of all these techniques and theories has been discussed and evaluated for years. Different therapists evulation of the same client, the explanation of different theories what makes therapy so volatile and subjectivity. When we examine this subjectivity, it consist of three parts: the subjectivity of the psychotherapist, the subjectivity of the client and the subjectivity of the psychotherapists-client. In this part of the presentation, a common ground will be presented by examining and discussing the common points of all these theories, techniques, the subjectivity of therapists, the subjectivity of the client and the subjectivities of the therapist-client bond.
